BetterQA says teams are shipping faster than they test

BetterQA says nearly one in three defects it reported to clients in 2026 was critical or high severity, underscoring a widening gap between AI-assisted development and quality review. The Cluj-Napoca testing firm is pitching outside testing, automation and security checks as a way to catch failures before customers, auditors or researchers do.

Why it matters: - BetterQA says modern software teams are shipping features faster than they are checking them. - The company says that gap is creating more high-impact defects, including issues that can block users, expose data or break downstream workflows. - For regulated products, missed defects can turn into compliance, audit and security problems, not just bug fixes.

What happened: - BetterQA said nearly one in three defects it reported to clients so far in 2026 was rated critical or high severity. - The independent software testing company is based in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, and was founded in 2018 by Tudor Brad and Ana Brad. - Tudor Brad said every team BetterQA talks to is shipping faster than it is checking. - Brad said the key question is whether teams hear about a failure from a customer or from BetterQA before release.

The details: - AI-assisted coding has made feature development cheaper, but review has not become cheaper at the same pace. - BetterQA says common failures include features that work in demos but fail on slow connections, copied permissions that go unchecked, and forms that miss edge cases. - The company said review often weakens as code volume rises, shifting from careful checking to approval. - BetterQA said larger codebases also create hidden dependency failures, such as scheduled jobs that were never meant to run together or features sharing a cache in incompatible ways. - BetterQA's testing approach includes manual testing, automation, security testing and compliance testing. - The company said its compliance testing covers healthcare requirements including ISO 13485 and FDA 21 CFR Part 11, plus financial services checks such as PCI DSS, transaction reconciliation and audit trail verification. - Every engagement includes five in-house tools at no extra cost: BugBoard, Flows, Auditi, BetterFlow and the AI Security Toolkit. - BetterQA said BugBoard and Flows support test generation and browser automation, Auditi handles accessibility testing, BetterFlow tracks delivery, and the AI Security Toolkit scans for security issues. - The company said the tools support tester judgment rather than replace it. - BetterQA offers a two-week proof of concept against a client's own codebase before a longer engagement. - BetterQA said the trial helps clients decide based on what they have actually seen.

Between the lines: - The pitch is not just about finding more bugs. - BetterQA is arguing that AI-assisted development has shifted the bottleneck from building to verifying, and that many teams have not staffed or structured for that shift. - The focus on outside testing also suggests a need for independent review when internal teams are under release pressure. - The compliance references point to a market where missed defects can create regulatory exposure as well as product risk.

What's next: - BetterQA will likely use the proof-of-concept offer to convert more teams that are unsure whether outside testing is worth the cost. - The company is positioning its automation and security tools as part of a broader testing stack for teams with higher release volume. - The underlying problem BetterQA describes is likely to grow if AI-assisted coding keeps accelerating without a matching increase in review capacity.

The bottom line: - BetterQA's core message is simple: shipping faster only helps if teams can check fast enough to catch critical defects before users do. - The company says many teams have not yet built that second half of the pipeline.